You are here
Catchment inputs into coastal waters
Poor in Western Port, Glenelg Catchment Management Authority, Port Phillip and Westernport Catchment Management Authority. Fair in Port Phillip Bay. Fair in Corangamite Catchment Management Authority, West Gippsland Catchment Management Authority. Good in East Gippsland Catchment Management Authority.
Data custodian:
DELWP Catchments, Waterways, Cities and Towns Environment Protection Authority; Catchment management authorities
Port Phillip Bay: EPA water quality report cards from 2012–13 to 2016–17 for the bay’s catchments showed a higher percentage of catchments with ‘fair’ to ‘very good’ ratings than those with ‘very poor’ to ‘poor’ ratings. Water quality was better in the middle and upper reaches of the catchments.
Western Port: The EPA’s first report card for Western Port in 2016-17 revealed that 78% of the catchment area was rated from ‘very poor’ to ‘fair’ even though water quality in the bay itself was rated as ‘good’.
Other marine and coastal areas: The catchment management authorities (CMAs) with coastal boundaries have rated the condition and water quality of their catchments ‘poor’ (Glenelg; Port Phillip and Westernport), ‘moderate’ (Corangamite; West Gippsland) and ‘good’ (East Gippsland).
Region:
Port Phillip Bay, Western Port, Catchment Management Authorities, Other Marine and Coastal Areas
Measures:
Annual load by pollutant, nutrients, water clarity (turbidity), dissolved oxygen, salinity (conductivity), pH, metals